I Y Rosenblum and A D Dayan

Carcinogenicity testing of IL-10: principles and practicalities
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 347-358. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

S DogÏru-AbbasogÏlu, J Balkan, Ö KanbagÏlõ, U Cevikbas, G Aykac-Toker, and M Uysal

Aminoguanidine, an inducible nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, plus N-acetylcysteine treatment reduce the lipopolysaccharideaugmented hepatotoxicity in rats with cirrhosis
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 359-364. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

R Pires das Neves, T Margarida Santos, M De Lourdes Pereira, and J Pedrosa de Jesus

Comparative histological studies on liver of mice exposed to Cr(VI) and Cr(V) compounds
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 365-369. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

P Kumar, R Vijayaraghavan, A S Kulkarni, U Pathak, S K Raza, and D K Jaiswal

In vivo protection by amifostine and DRDE-07 against sulphur mustard toxicity
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 371-376. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

A F Ab Rahman

Drug and chemical poisoning admissions at a teaching hospital in Malaysia
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 377-381. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

E J Calabrese

Introduction to BELLE newsletter: The role of hormesis in industrial hygiene/occupational health
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 383. [PDF]  

M A Jayjock and P G Lewis

Implications of hormesis for industrial hygiene
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 385-389. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

M O Brophy

Comments: implications of hormesis for industrial hygienists
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 391-393. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

L M Brosseau

Review of ‘Implications of hormesis for industrial hygiene’
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 395. [Abstract] [PDF]  

Sl Brown

Comments on ‘Implications of hormesis for industrial hygiene’
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 397-398. [Abstract] [PDF]  

D C Christiani and W Zhou

Hormesis: the new approach in risk assessment?
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 399-400. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

G Carelli, I Iavicoli, and N Castellino

Hormesis and industrial hygiene: a new hypothesis for low-dose response in occupational risk assessment
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 401-403. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

K K Rozman and J Doull

Comments on the Jayjock et al. paper
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 405-406. [Abstract] [PDF] [References]  

M A Jayjock and P G Lewis

Jayjock and Lewis reply
Hum Exp Toxicol 2002 21: 407-408. [Abstract] [PDF]  

To see an article, click its [PDF] link. To add articles to your marked citations, check the boxes to the left of the titles you want, and click the 'Add to Marked Citations' button. To see one abstract at a time, click its [Abstract] link.