|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Defining hormesis
E J Calabrese
Environmental Health Sciences, Morrill I, N344, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA; edwardc{at}schoolph.umass.edu
L A Baldwin
Environmental Health Sciences, Morrill I, N344, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA
Much confusion surrounds the concept of hormesis and what its biological meaning represents. This paper provides a definition of hormesis that addresses its historical foundations, quantitative features, and under-lying evolutionary and toxicologically based mechanistic strategies. Hormesis should be considered an adaptive response characterized by biphasic dose responses of generally similar quantitative features with respect to amplitude and range of the stimulatory response that are either directly induced or the result of compensatory biological processes following an initial disruption in homeostasis. Given the limited magnitude of the stimulatory response (i.e., usually 3060% greater than controls at maximum), heightened study design and replication requirements are often necessary to ensure reliable judgments on causality. Even though hormesis is considered an adaptive response, the issue of beneficial/harmful effects should not be part of the definition of hormesis, but reserved to a subsequent evaluation of the biological and ecological context of the response.
Key Words: adaptive response biphasic hormesis overcompensation risk assessment U-shaped
Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 21, No. 2,
91-97 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327102ht217oa

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Raubenheimer and S. J. Simpson
Nutritional PharmEcology: Doses, nutrients, toxins, and medicines
Integr. Comp. Biol.,
September 1, 2009;
49(3):
329 - 337.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K Shrader-Frechette
Ideological toxicology: invalid logic, science, ethics about low-dose pollution
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
August 1, 2008;
27(8):
647 - 657.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Elliott
A case for deliberation in response to hormesis research
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
July 1, 2008;
27(7):
529 - 538.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D. Wu, J. R. Cypser, A. I. Yashin, and T. E. Johnson
The U-Shaped Response of Initial Mortality in Caenorhabditis elegans to Mild Heat Shock: Does It Explain Recent Trends in Human Mortality?
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.,
July 1, 2008;
63(7):
660 - 668.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Hamel, E. Abed, L. Brissette, and R. Moreau
Characterization of oxidized low-density lipoprotein-induced hormesis-like effects in osteoblastic cells
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol,
April 1, 2008;
294(4):
C1021 - C1033.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. J. Calabrese
Another California Milestone: The First Application of Hormesis in Litigation and Regulation
International Journal of Toxicology,
January 1, 2008;
27(1):
31 - 33.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
D Henschler
The origin of hormesis: historical background and driving forces
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
July 1, 2006;
25(7):
347 - 351.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J Doull
Comments on the Environmental Protection Agency's definition of risk assessment
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
January 1, 2006;
25(1):
44 - 45.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Weltje, F. S vom Saal, and J. Oehlmann
Reproductive stimulation by low doses of xenoestrogens contrasts with the view of hormesis as an adaptive response
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
September 1, 2005;
24(9):
431 - 437.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P M Chapman
Defining hormesis: comments on Calabrese and Baldwin (2002)
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
February 1, 2002;
21(2):
99 - 101.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J A Pickrell and F W Oehme
Invited response to definition of hormesis (EJ Calabrese and LA Baldwin)
Human and Experimental Toxicology,
February 1, 2002;
21(2):
107 - 109.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
|
|