This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Heyerdahl, F Articles by Jacobsen, D Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Heyerdahl, F Articles by Jacobsen, D Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Clinical assessment compared to laboratory screening in acutely poisoned patients

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

KE Hovda

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

MA Bjornaas

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

O Brørs

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

O Ekeberg

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Behavioural Sciences in Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway

D Jacobsen

Department of Acute Medicine, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Acute poisonings may require identification of the toxic agents. It is impossible for routine laboratories to provide a full spectrum of toxicological analyses, and clinicians should know the reliability of the clinical diagnoses of toxic agents. We performed a 1-year study of hospitalized acute poisonings to determine the agreement between the clinical assessment on admission and serum laboratory tests for eight common toxic agents. Blood samples were drawn in 665 (70%) of the 947 admissions. The total number of laboratory found agents (967) exceeded the clinically suspected (871) by 11%. The agreement between the clinical assessment and laboratory analyses was good for ethanol and paracetamol (�=�0.70 for both), whereas only moderate or fair for other agents ( 0.22–0.51). Sensitivities of the clinical assessments compared to the laboratory results were better for common than rare agents, and better for higher than lower serum concentrations. The four most common agents (ethanol, benzodiazepines, paracetamol, and opiates) had overall sensitivity of 82% for higher-than-median serum concentrations, whereas the other agents had sensitivities ranging from 14% to 71% for higher-than-median concentrations. The reliability of the clinical diagnoses varied to such an extent that agents, which are important to recognize for specific treatment, should be tested for.

Key Words: blood chemical analyses • diagnosis • pharmaceutical preparations • poisoning • street drugs

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?