SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Baverstock, K.
Right arrow Articles by Belyakov, O. V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Baverstock, K.
Right arrow Articles by Belyakov, O. V
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Classical radiation biology, the bystander effect and paradigms: a reply

Keith Baverstock

Department of Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Natural and Environmental Sciences, University of Kuopio, 70211 Kuopio, Finland Keith.baverstock{at}uku.fi

Oleg V Belyakov

STUK-Radiation and Nuclear Safety Authority, Research and Environmental Surveillance, Radiation Biology Laboratory, PO Box 14, 00881 Helsinki, Finland

Although, in retrospect, it can be seen that the bystander effect and the related effect of genomic instability were observed well before they were recognized as such, they have not been able to be accommodated within the existing understanding of how radiation causes late effects, which provides the basis for radiological protection standards. It is argued here that before these effects can be fully researched and there can be full confidence in radiological protection, a paradigm shift that provides a framework in which these effects can be considered alongside the well established effects of radiation is needed. In particular this framework will encompass the epigenetic as well as genetic aspects of radiation biology. Examples of how this might be achieved are given.

Key Words: bystander effect • epigenetic information • genomic instability • paradigm shift • radiation biology

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 24, No. 10, 537-542 (2005)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327105ht562oa
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
I. Fairlie
Commentary on UNSCEAR 2006 Report: Annex C--the New Effects of Radiation
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, February 1, 2010; 138(2): 190 - 193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Advertisement