SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Van Ravenzwaay, B
Right arrow Articles by Leibold, E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Van Ravenzwaay, B
Right arrow Articles by Leibold, E
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

A comparison between in vitro rat and human and in vivo rat skin absorption studies

B Van Ravenzwaay

BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Z 470, D-67056 Ludwig-shafen, Germany bennard.ravenzwaay{at}basf-ag.de

E Leibold

BASF Aktiengesellschaft, Experimental Toxicology and Ecology, Z 470, D-67056 Ludwigshafen, Germany

In vitro skin penetration rates in rat and man were compared to those obtained in vivo in rats. Saturation of absorption was frequently observed at higher exposure levels in in vitro and in vivo. Lipophilic compounds showed the highest penetration rates through rat skin in vitro. In all cases in vitro dermal penetration through rat skin was higher than in vivo. Thus, the in vitro study may serve as a first tier test. The in vivo data suggest an inverse relationship between molecular weight and the rate of dermal absorption for lipophilic as well as hydrophilic compounds. Rat skin was more permeable to all tested substances than human skin (mean difference 10.9-fold). Thus, the systemic exposure of humans may be significantly overestimated if risk assessment is based only on the results of an in vivo rat study, because human skin is less permeable than rat skin. It would appear, therefore, that an estimate of actual dermal penetration through human skin should be based on the combined use of in vivo and in vitro data, using the following equation:

%Human dermal penetration

=(%rat in vivo dermal penetration)

(See PDF for Formula)

Key Words: absorption • human • in vitro • in vivo • rat • skin

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 23, No. 9, 421-430 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327104ht471oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
I Jakasa and S Kezic
Evaluation of in-vivo animal and in-vitro models for prediction of dermal absorption in man
Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2008; 27(4): 281 - 288.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement