SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kassis, A. I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kassis, A. I
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In vivo validation of the bystander effect

Amin I Kassis

Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Harvard Medical School, Goldenson Building B-242, 220 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA, amin_kassis{at}hms.harvard.edu

The bystander effect post radionuclide decay describes the biologic response(s) of cells not directly targeted by the radiation insult. Recently, we demonstrated that the specific irradiation of human tumor cells in vivo leads to a bystander effect in subcutaneously growing tumors. These in vivo findings 1) call for the re-evaluation of approaches currently used for estimating the risks to individuals/populations inadvertently exposed internally to radioactivity (e.g., alpha particles) as well as to patients undergoing routine diagnostic nuclear medical procedures, and 2) impact significantly the current dogma for assessing the therapeutic potential of internally administered radionuclides.

Key Words: Auger electron emitters • iodine-125 • in vivo bystander effect • radioactive decay • risk assessment • therapeutic effectiveness

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 23, No. 2, 71-73 (2004)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327104ht420oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
C. Mothersill and C. B. Seymour
Targeted Radiotherapy: Is the "Holy Grail" in Sight?
J. Nucl. Med., June 1, 2006; 47(6): 899 - 900.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
C. A. Boswell and M. W. Brechbiel
Auger Electrons: Lethal, Low Energy, and Coming Soon to a Tumor Cell Nucleus Near You
J. Nucl. Med., December 1, 2005; 46(12): 1946 - 1947.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement