SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stallard, N.
Right arrow Articles by Indans, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stallard, N.
Right arrow Articles by Indans, I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Statistical evaluation of the Fixed Concentration Procedure for acute inhalation toxicity assessment

Nigel Stallard

MPS Research Unit, The University of Reading, PO Box 240, Earley Gate, Reading, RG6 6FN, UK n.stallard{at}reading.ac.uk

Anne Whitehead

Medical and Pharmaceutical Statistics Research Unit, The University of Reading, Reading, UK

Ian Indans

Health Directorate, Health and Safety Executive, Bootle, Merseyside, UK

The conventional method for the assessment of acute inhalation toxicity (OECD Test Guideline 403, 1981) uses death of animals as an endpoint to identify the median lethal concentration (LC50). A new OECD Testing Guideline called the Fixed Concentration Procedure (FCP) is being prepared to provide an alternative to Test Guideline 403. Unlike Test Guideline 403, the FCP does not provide a point estimate of the LC50, but aims to identify an airborne exposure level that causes clear signs of nonlethal toxicity. This is then used to assign classification according to the new Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling scheme (GHS). The FCP has been validated using statistical simulation rather than byin vivo testing. The statistical simulation approach predicts the GHS classification outcome and the numbers of deaths and animals used in the test for imaginary substances with a range of LC50 values and dose response curve slopes. This paper describes the FCP and reports the results from the statistical simulation study assessing its properties. It is shown that the procedure will be completed with considerably less death and suffering than Test Guideline 403, and will classify substances either in the same or a more stringent GHS class than that assigned on the basis of the LC50 value.

Key Words: acute inhalation toxicity testing • LC50 test • median lethal concentration • OECD Test Guideline 403

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 22, No. 11, 575-585 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327103ht395oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Innate ImmunityHome page
S. Hoffmann, U. Luderitz-Puchel, T. Montag, and T. Hartung
Optimisation of pyrogen testing in parenterals according to different pharmacopoeias by probabilistic modelling
Innate Immunity, February 1, 2005; 11(1): 25 - 31.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
N. Stallard, A. Whitehead, and I. Indans
Statistical evaluation of an acute dermal toxicity test using the dermal fixed dose procedure
Human and Experimental Toxicology, August 1, 2004; 23(8): 405 - 412.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Advertisement