This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Greim, H Articles by Edler, L Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Greim, H Articles by Edler, L Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Evaluation of historical control data in carcinogenicity studies

Institute of Toxicology and Environmental Hygiene, Technical University of Munich, D-85354 FreisingWeihenstephan

H-P Gelbke

Institute for Toxicology, BASF AG, D-67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany

U Reuter

Institute of Toxicology and Environmental Hygiene, Technical University of Munich, D-85354 FreisingWeihenstephan

H W Thielmann

L Edler

German Cancer Research Center, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

Results obtained in long-term carcinogenicity studies with animals should be evaluated, first and foremost, by statistical comparisons of the data obtained from the treated group with that from the concurrent control group. Often the results are compared with data from so-called historical control groups in order to take variations in the incidences of spontaneous tumours into account. Because historical control data change in the course of time and for a variety of reasons, certain requirements must be met before they may be used in the evaluation of the results of long-term studies.

The present paper discusses potential sources of variability of tumour incidences in untreated animals, presents databanks for historical control data, mentions the factors that affect tumour incidences in untreated animals and describes biostatistical data evaluation. Finally, details are given of the criteria used by the DFG Commission for the Investigation of Health Hazards of Chemical Compounds in the Work Area to decide whether historical control data may be applied. These include the requirement that the historical control data were obtained with animals of the same species and strain and from the same breeder. The data were obtained in the same laboratory, the study design, experimental methods and assessment criteria were the same, and the studies used for the comparison were carried out within a limited time window. Historical control data that have not been published may be used provided they fulfil the above criteria and have been made available in sufficient detail to be comprehensible.

Key Words: carcinogenicity • historical control data • long-term animal studies

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 22, No. 10, 541-549 (2003)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327103ht394oa


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Keenan, S. Elmore, S. Francke-Carroll, R. Kemp, R. Kerlin, S. Peddada, J. Pletcher, M. Rinke, S. P. Schmidt, I. Taylor, et al. Best Practices for Use of Historical Control Data of Proliferative Rodent Lesions Toxicol Pathol, August 1, 2009; 37(5): 679 - 693. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. E. Brix, A. Nyska, J. K. Haseman, D. M. Sells, M. P. Jokinen, and N. J. Walker Incidences of Selected Lesions in Control Female Harlan Sprague-Dawley Rats from Two-Year Studies Performed by the National Toxicology Program Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2005; 33(4): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Baldrick Carcinogenicity Evaluation: Comparison of Tumor Data from Dual Control Groups in the Sprague-Dawley Rat Toxicol Pathol, February 1, 2005; 33(2): 283 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]