SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dayan, A D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dayan, A D
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Conclusions and future directions: a personal view from the session chair

A D Dayan

Retired. c/o HESI

Developmental immunotoxicity is new both as an area of scientific study and as a potential source of concern in the protection of the public health. It is a combination of three nascent sciences and one older established area of study–immunology, `Development’, toxicological science and the practical application of experimental findings to indicate risks to man and means to control them. This hardworking and very successful meeting, organized by the Immunotoxicology Technical Committee (ITC) of the International Life Sciences Institute (ILSI) Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) with input from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), provided an appropriate setting in which scientists from industrial, academic and regulatory backgrounds were able to debate how the development of the immune system might be affected by toxicity, and ways in which transient and permanent harmful effects might occur. There was considerable interest in how the basic processes and structures of immunity and development might be affected by model substances, which could afford examples to demonstrate the value of laboratory methods to detect developmental immunotoxicity. There were vigorous discussions about testing strategies, about techniques, about how to `validate’ laboratory methods when there was relatively little consistent information from man to identify suitable positive control substances and cardinal disorders, and about how best to employ the sparse information to support the effective prediction of risk.

Key Words: developmental immunotoxicology • immunology • research needs • risk assessment

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 21, No. 9-10, 569-572 (2002)
DOI: 10.1191/0960327102ht296oa


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement