SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, K L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hastings, K L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Assessment of immunosuppressant drug carcinogenicity: standard and alternative animal models

K L Hastings

Division of Special Pathogen and Immunologic Drug Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20857, USA

Drugs intended for use in preventing allograft rejection in transplant patients are likely to be administered chroni-cally; thus, it is normally expected that sponsors would conduct nonclinical studies to determine the carcinogenic potential of candidate compounds. For pharmaceuticals other than biologic agents, this would mean that rodent carcinogenicity bioassays would be performed under most circumstances. Immunosuppressant drugs have presented unique challenges with respect to the issue of carcino-genicity bioassays. The pharmacological activity of ther-apeutic immunosuppressants is thought to make them highly likely to act as promoters/cocarcinogens, even in the absence of genotoxic activity. Thus, it is assumed that this class of drug would represent a carcinogenic hazard in the absence of confirmatory standard rodent bioassay data. In addition, rodents typically have been sensitive to the pharmacological/toxicological effects of immunosup-pressants. It has proven to be difficult, therefore, to conduct life-time bioassays at doses reasonably equiva-lent to those that would be used clinically. For this and other reasons, alternative models might be more appro-priate for risk assessment with this class of drugs.

Key Words: immunosuppressants • carcinogenicity • alternative • models

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 19, No. 4, 261-265 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/096032700678815837


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement