Human & Experimental Toxicology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to register today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rodgman, A
Right arrow Articles by Perfetti, T A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rodgman, A
Right arrow Articles by Perfetti, T A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 19, No. 10, 573-595 (2000)
DOI: 10.1191/096032700701546514
© 2000 SAGE Publications

The composition of cigarette smoke: a retrospective, with emphasis on polycyclic components

A Rodgman

Fundamental Research, R&D, RJRT Company, 2828 Birchwood Drive, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103-3410, USA

C J Smith

Research and Development, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102, USA; Bowman Gray Technical Center, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102, USA

T A Perfetti

Research and Development, R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27102, USA

The difficulties encountered in extrapolating biological activity from cigarette smoke composition provide generally applicable lessons as they are representative of the problems encountered with other complex mixtures. Researchers attempting to assess risk are faced with attempting to interpret data from a number of areas including: tobacco science; smoke/aerosol chemistry specific to tobacco; sophisticated analytical chemistry applications and techniques for trapping, collecting, separating, and quantifying very specific compounds at nanogram to picogram levels; numerous biological testing methodologies; and animal models of tumors and carcinogenesis. Numerous hypotheses have been developed over the past five decades and tested with the technology of the day in attempts to interpret the biological activity of cigarette smoke in relation to the chemistry of this complex mixture. These hypotheses fall into several categories discussed in this review: mechanisms of pyrogenesis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in tobacco smoke; levels of PAHs in cigarette mainstream smoke (MS) and its tumorigenicity in mouse skin-painting experiments; control of PAH levels in MS; chemical indicators of cigarette smoke condensate (CSC) tumorigenicity; control of levels of MS components partitioned between the vapor phase and particulate phase of MS; tumorigenic threshold limits of CSC and many of its components; tumorigenic aza-arenes in tobacco smoke; MS components reported to be ciliastatic to smokers' respiratory tract cilia; anticarcinogenic tobacco-smoke components. Of 52 hypotheses reviewed in this paper, 15 have excellent data supporting the hypothesis based on today's technology. The remaining 37 hypotheses, although originally plausible, have since become insupportable in light of new and contradictory data generated over the years. Such data were generated sometimes by the original authors of the hypotheses and sometimes by other investigators. The hypotheses presented today are less likely to be supplanted because they are well conceived and have a strong mechanistic basis. The challenge for the future is the generation and interpretation of data relating the chemistry and biological activity associated with the dynamic and complex mixture of tobacco smoke.

Key Words: PAHs • benzo[{alpha}]pyrene • cigarette smoke • history • azaarenes • phenols • carbonyl compounds • NNAs • tumorigenicity • anticarcinogenicity


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. A. Rybicki, C. Neslund-Dudas, C. H. Bock, A. Rundle, A. T. Savera, J. J. Yang, N. L. Nock, and D. Tang
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon-DNA Adducts in Prostate and Biochemical Recurrence after Prostatectomy
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2008; 14(3): 750 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Alexandrov, M. Rojas, and C. Rolando
DNA Damage by Benzo(a)pyrene in Human Cells Is Increased by Cigarette Smoke and Decreased by a Filter Containing Rosemary Extract, Which Lowers Free Radicals
Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 66(24): 11938 - 11945.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
W. R. Fields, R. M. Leonard, P. S. Odom, B. K. Nordskog, M. W. Ogden, and D. J. Doolittle
Gene Expression in Normal Human Bronchial Epithelial (NHBE) Cells Following In Vitro Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Condensate
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2005; 86(1): 84 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
T. J. Page, S. O'Brien, K. Holston, P. S. MacWilliams, C. R. Jefcoate, and C. J. Czuprynski
7,12-Dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-Induced Bone Marrow Toxicity Is p53-Dependent
Toxicol. Sci., July 1, 2003; 74(1): 85 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
C. J. Smith, T. A. Perfetti, M. J. Morton, A. Rodgman, R. Garg, C. D. Selassie, and C. Hansch
The Relative Toxicity of Substituted Phenols Reported in Cigarette Mainstream Smoke
Toxicol. Sci., September 1, 2002; 69(1): 265 - 278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]