SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heydens, W F
Right arrow Articles by Martens, M A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heydens, W F
Right arrow Articles by Martens, M A
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of the herbicide alachlor4 to man

W F Heydens

A GE Wilson

L D Kier

Monsanto Company, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St Louis, Missouri 63167, USA

H Lau

Mitchell Madison Group, 9 West, 57th Street, New York, NY 10019, USA

D C Thake

Monsanto Company, 800 North Lindbergh Boulevard, St Louis, Missouri 63167, USA

M A Martens

Monsanto Europe/Africa S.A., 5 Rue Laid Burniat, B-1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

Chronic bioassays have revealed that alachlor caused nasal, thyroid, and stomach tumours in rats but was not carcinogenic in mice. Significant increases in thyroid and stomach tumours were observed only at doses that exceeded the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). While nasal tumours were found at doses below the MTD, they were small and benign in nature. This publication describes the work undertaken by Monsanto to understand the carcinogenic mode of action of alachlor in the rat and to investigate the relevance to humans.

The genetic toxicity of alachlor has been investigated in an extensive battery of in vitro and in vivo test systems. In addition, target-specific mutagenicity tests, such as the COMET assay and DNA binding in nasal tissue, were carried out to investigate any possible in-situ genotoxic action. The weight-of-evidence analysis of all available data clearly demonstrates that alachlor exerts its carcinogenicity in the rat by non-genotoxic mechanisms.

In the rat, alachlor is initially metabolised primarily in the liver through the P-450 pathway and by glutathione conjugation. The glutathione conjugates and their metabolites undergo enterohepatic circulation with further metabolism in the gastrointestinal tract, liver, and then nasal tissue where they can be converted to a diethyliminoquinone metabolite (DEIQ). This electrophilic species binds to the cysteine moiety of proteins leading to cell damage and increased cell turnover. When comparisons of in vitro nasal metabolic capability were made, the rat's capacity to form DEIQ from precursor metabolites was 38 times greater than for the mouse, 30-fold higher than monkey, and 751 times greater than that of humans. This data is consistent with the results of studies showing in vivo formation of DEIQ-protein adducts in the nasal tissue of rats but not mice or monkeys. The lack of DEIQ nasal adducts in mice is consistent with the lack of nasal tumours in that species. When the differences between rat and humans in the capacity for initial glutathione conjugation by the liver and nasal tissue are also taken into account, the rat is found to be even more susceptible to DEIQ formation than man. Based on this, it is clear that the potential for DEIQ formation and nasal tumour development in humans is negligible.

The mechanism of stomach tumour formation has been studied in the rat. The results demonstrated that the mechanism is threshold-sensitive and involves a combination of regenerative cell proliferation and a gastrininduced tropic effect on enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cells and stem cells of the mucosal epithelium. The absence of a carcinogenic effect in mice and of any preneoplastic effect in monkeys treated with very high doses is indicative of the species-specific aspect of this mechanism of action.

The results of studies on thyroid tumour production indicate that alachlor is acting indirectly through the pituitary-thyroid axis by increasing the excretion of T4 by enhanced glucuronidation and subsequent biliary excretion. The increased excretion reduces plasma T4 levels and a feedback mechanism leads to increased synthesis of TSH by the pituitary. Chronic stimulation of the follicular epithelium of the thyroid by TSH produces hyperplasia and ultimately tumour formation. This non-genotoxic, threshold-based mechanism is well established and widely considered to be not relevant to humans.

In this work, the modes of action for the three types of tumours elicited in the rat by alachlor were investigated. All are based on non-genotoxic, threshold-sensitive processes. From all the data presented it can be concluded that the tumours detected in the rat are not relevant to man and that alachlor presents no significant cancer risk to humans. This conclusion is supported by the lack of mortality and tumours in an epidemiology study of alachlor manufacturing workers.

Key Words: alachlor • human carcinogenic potential • non-geno-toxic carcinogenesis

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 18, No. 6, 363-391 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/096032799678840219


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
A. M. Jeffrey, M. J. Iatropoulos, and G. M. Williams
Nasal Cytotoxic and Carcinogenic Activities of Systemically Distributed Organic Chemicals
Toxicol Pathol, December 1, 2006; 34(7): 827 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Mattiuzzo, M. Fiore, R. Ricordy, and F. Degrassi
Aneuploidy-inducing capacity of two widely used pesticides
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2006; 27(12): 2511 - 2518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
A. G. Hackett, D. I. Gustafson, S. J. Moran, P. Hendley, I. van Wesenbeeck, N. D. Simmons, A. J. Klein, J. M. Kronenberg, J. D. Fuhrman, J. L. Honegger, et al.
The Acetochlor Registration Partnership Surface Water Monitoring Program for Four Corn Herbicides
J. Environ. Qual., April 20, 2005; 34(3): 877 - 889.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
J F Acquavella, E Delzell, H Cheng, C F Lynch, and G Johnson
Mortality and cancer incidence among alachlor manufacturing workers 1968-99
Occup. Environ. Med., August 1, 2004; 61(8): 680 - 685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
W. J. Lee, J. A. Hoppin, A. Blair, J. H. Lubin, M. Dosemeci, D. P. Sandler, and M. C. R. Alavanja
Cancer Incidence among Pesticide Applicators Exposed to Alachlor in the Agricultural Health Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2004; 159(4): 373 - 380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
W. F. Heydens, A. G. E. Wilson, L. J. Kraus, W. E. Hopkins II, and K. J. Hotz
Ethane Sulfonate Metabolite of Alachlor: Assessment of Oncogenic Potential Based on Metabolic and Mechanistic Considerations
Toxicol. Sci., May 1, 2000; 55(1): 36 - 43.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement