Human & Experimental Toxicology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fan, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 18, No. 4, 233-240 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/096032799678839978

Mainstream and sidestream cigarette smoke condensates suppress macrophage responsiveness to interferony

Kimberlee Edwards

Department of Biology, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois 61625, USA

Kristen M Braun

Department of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, 53706 USA

Glenn Evans

Department of Biology, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois 61625, USA

Amod O Sureka

Samuel Fan

Department of Biology, Bradley University, Peoria, Illinois 61625, USA

Sidestream smoke evolves from the smoldering end of a cigarette while the smoker is not puffing, and contributes substantially to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). In contrast, main stream smoke emerges from the butt end of the cigarette and is mainly inhaled by the smoker. This study was performed to compare the effects of short-term exposure to cigarette smoke condensates prepared from sidestream (CSCSS) and mainstream cigarette smoke (CSC-MS) on macrophage basal metabolism and responsiveness to two different stimuli, bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferony (IFNy). Despite their generation at different temperatures and their different chemical composition, CSC-SS and CSC-MS had similar effects on macrophages. Both enhanced macrophage basal metabolism and responsiveness to LPS. Macrophage responsiveness to IFNy, assessed by their expression of four functional capacities, was suppressed by both CSC-SS and CSC-MS. The four assessed IFNy-inducible functional capacities were: enhanced phagocytosis of immuoglobulin-opsonized sheep red blood cells, TPAinduced peroxide production, class II major histocompatibility complex expression, and nitric oxide synthesis with LPS co-stimulation. The effects of CSCSS and CSC-MS were similar qualitatively; they differ quantitatively in some cases, with CSC-MS generally effective at lower concentrations (expressed as cigarette-equivalents) than CSCSS. Considering dilution of sidestream smoke in room air and loss during passage through the respiratory system, we expect to deliver the maximal dose to lung macrophages in situ only in rooms dense with smokers. However, only a fraction ofthe maximal dose can partially suppress induction of some fiuctions, such as nitric oxide production and MHC expression. Macrophages play critical roles in tissue modeling during development. Of particular concern are neonates, whose organs are still undergoing growth and development, and are therefore susceptible to impaired development. If involuntary exposure to ETS hinders induction of macrophage functional capacities by cytokines, then development of the lungs and perhaps other organs would be impaired. In general, since macrophages are potent effectors and regulators of immunity, impairment of their responsiveness to cytokine must disrupt the proper functioning of the immune system.

Key Words: macrophage • phagocytosis • respiratory burst • class II major histocompatibility complex • nitric oxide • immunotoxicology


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Infect. Immun.Home page
P. J. Christensen, A. M. Preston, T. Ling, M. Du, W. B. Fields, J. L. Curtis, and J. M. Beck
Pneumocystis murina Infection and Cigarette Smoke Exposure Interact To Cause Increased Organism Burden, Development of Airspace Enlargement, and Pulmonary Inflammation in Mice
Infect. Immun., August 1, 2008; 76(8): 3481 - 3490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
S. McGrath-Morrow, T. Rangasamy, C. Cho, T. Sussan, E. Neptune, R. Wise, R. M. Tuder, and S. Biswal
Impaired Lung Homeostasis in Neonatal Mice Exposed to Cigarette Smoke
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., April 1, 2008; 38(4): 393 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
J. R. DiFranza, C. A. Aligne, and M. Weitzman
Prenatal and Postnatal Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Children's Health
Pediatrics, April 1, 2004; 113(4/S1): 1007 - 1015.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. A. Aligne, M. E. Moss, P. Auinger, and M. Weitzman
Association of Pediatric Dental Caries With Passive Smoking
JAMA, March 12, 2003; 289(10): 1258 - 1264.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
E. Nelson
The miseries of passive smoiong
Human and Experimental Toxicology, February 1, 2001; 20(2): 61 - 83.
[Abstract] [PDF]