This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Lutz, W K Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lutz, W K Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Dose-response relationships in chemical carcinogenesis reflect differences in individual susceptibility. Consequences for cancer risk assessment, extrapolation, and prevention

Department of Toxicology, University of Wuerzburg, Versbacher St. 9, Wuerzburg D-97078, Germany

The shape of the dose-cancer incidence curve observed in an animal bioassay for carcinogenicity of a chemical is the result of a superposition of various mechanisms contributing to the process of carcinogenesis. For genotoxic carcinogens, for instance, a sublinear (convex; up-bent) shape could be the result of a saturation of DNA repair or of a higher rate of cell turnover associated with high-dose cytotoxicity and regenerative hyperplasia. In human cancer epidemiology, the situation is more complex. The human population is very heterogeneous with respect to both genetic and life-style factors that modulate the process of tumor formation. Therefore, individuals are expected to show widely variable susceptibility to carcinogenic factors, and the dose-response curve is in fact a reflection of the tolerance distribution. Each modulating factor divides the population up into sub populations of different susceptibility so that nonlinearities that could be present in a homogeneous population are flattened out. A linear extrapolation of a human cancer risk to low dose might therefore be appropriate under certain conditions even if the dose-response curve in animals has a strongly sigmoidal shape. For cancer prevention, the investigation of susceptibility factors is expected to be of great value. The elimination of concurrent risk factors in high-risk subpopulations or individuals might be more effective than a minor general reduction of a tolerable exposure level.

Key Words: dose • carcinogen • cancer • risk • individual • susceptibility

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 18, No. 12, 707-712 (1999)
DOI: 10.1191/096032799678839653


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. W. Mohrenweiser Genetic Variation and Exposure Related Risk Estimation: Will Toxicology Enter a New Era? DNA Repair and Cancer as a Paradigm Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1_suppl): 136 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. Eder and Budiawan Cancer Risk Assessment for the Environmental Mutagen and Carcinogen Crotonaldehyde on the Basis of TD50 and Comparison with 1,N2-Propanodeoxyguanosine Adduct Levels Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2001; 10(8): 883 - 888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]