This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Turturro, A. Articles by Hart, R. W Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Turturro, A. Articles by Hart, R. W Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Hormesis - Implications for risk assessment caloric intake (body weight) as an exemplar

Division of Biometry and Risk Assessment, National Center for Toxicological Research, 3900 N.C.T.R. Road, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA

Bruce Hass

Division of Genetic Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, 3900 N.C.T.R. Road, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA

Ronald W Hart

Office of the Director, National Center for Toxicological Research, 3900 N.C.T.R. Road, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA

Hormesis can be considered as a parameter which has a non-monotonic relationship with some endpoint. Since caloric intake is such a parameter, and the impact of this parameter on risk assessment has been fairly well characterized, it can provide clues as to how to integrate the information from a hormetic parameter into risk assessments for toxicants. Based on the work with caloric intake, one could: (a) define a biomarker for hormetic effect; (b) integrate specific information on when in the animals lifespan the parameter is active to influence parameters such as survival; (c) evaluate component effects of the overall hormetic response; and (d) address the consequences of a non-monotonic relationship between the hormetic parameter and endpoints critical for risk assessment.

These impacts on risk assessments have been characterized for chronic tests, but are also true for short-term tests. A priority is the characterization of the dose-response curves for hormetic parameters. This quantification will be critical in utilizing them in risk assessment. With this information, one could better quantitatively address the changes one expects to result from the hormetic parameter, and limit the uncertainty and variability which occurs in toxicity testing.

Key Words: hormesis • bioassay • dietary control • body weight • non-monotonic • caloric intake

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 17, No. 8, 454-459 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719801700810


CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Houthoofd, T. E. Johnson, and J. R. Vanfleteren Dietary Restriction in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2005; 60(9): 1125 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]