Human & Experimental Toxicology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boothman, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Mendonca, M. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boothman, D. A
Right arrow Articles by Mendonca, M. S
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 17, No. 8, 448-453 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719801700809

Molecular analyses of adaptive survival responses (ASRs): role of ASRs in radiotherapy

David A Boothman

Department of Human Oncology, K4/626 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USAa

Eric Odegaard

Department of Human Oncology, K4/626 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA

Chin-Rang Yang

Department of Human Oncology, K4/626 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA

Kelly Hosley

Department of Human Oncology, K4/626 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53792, USA

Marc S Mendonca

Radiation and Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, 975 West Walnut Street, IB-346, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA

Adaptive survival responses (ASRs), whereby cells demonstrate a survival advantage when exposed to very low doses of ionizing radiation (IR) 4-24 h prior to a high dose challenge, were first reported over 15 years ago. These responses were linked to hormesis, which implied that exposure to low levels of IR may be beneficial to the cell. We postulate that increased survival does not necessarily mean that the treatment is beneficial.

Studies at the molecular level indicate that ASRs are the result of misregulated cell cycle checkpoint responses, occurring in the G1 phase of the cell cycle after IR. Specific gene products (i.e., PCNA, cyclin D1, cyclin A, XIP8, xip5 and xip13) appear to control these cell cycle checkpoint responses. Certain neoplastic cells show potent ASRs because they bypass checkpoints which would otherwise lead to apoptosis or other forms of cell death (possibly necrosis), and/or these cancer cells lack genetic factors, such as specific caspases (cysteine aspartate-specific proteases), that control apoptosis. Alterations in these cell cycle checkpoints or apoptotic responses may also occur during IR-induced stress responses in normal cells, at critical times (10-18 days posttreatment) following IR. One IR-induced protein, XIP8, may be a critical controlling factor at this point where delayed-onset apoptosis occurs. Additionally, we have shown that the presence or absence (i.e., SCID cells) of nonhomologous DNA double strand break repair did not seem to influence ASRs, suggesting that ASRs may be caused by signal transduction stress responses.

ASRs may be beneficial to survival, however, the consequence(s) of that survival may be dire. For example, many neoplastic cells exhibited far greater ASRs than normal cells. Additionally, ASRs were induced by as little as 1 cGy and and were enhanced by repeated exposures of low level radiation. The implications for radiotherapy are that when a patient arrives for port film imaging during the course of therapy, the dose-rate, overall level of exposure, and time between port film exposure and high dose IR treatment become potentially important factors for improved efficacy of treatment of certain cancers. Further research is warranted to determine what molecular factors are most important for ASRs, and current work is focusing on XIP8.

Key Words: adaptive survival responses • X-ray-inducible proteins/ transcripts • delayed apoptosis • DNA-PK • carcinogenesis • XIPB


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Xia, A. Paik, and J. J. Li
p53 Activation in Chronic Radiation-Treated Breast Cancer Cells: Regulation of MDM2/p14ARF
Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 64(1): 221 - 228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C.-R. Yang, K. Leskov, K. Hosley-Eberlein, T. Criswell, J. J. Pink, T. J. Kinsella, and D. A. Boothman
Nuclear clusterin/XIP8, an x-ray-induced Ku70-binding protein that signals cell death
PNAS, May 23, 2000; 97(11): 5907 - 5912.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
L Cai
Research of the adaptive response induced by low-dose radiation: where have we been and where should we go?
Human and Experimental Toxicology, July 1, 1999; 18(7): 419 - 425.
[PDF]