SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liteplo, R. G
Right arrow Articles by Meek, M E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Liteplo, R. G
Right arrow Articles by Meek, M E
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*DICHLOROMETHANE
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Relevance of carcinogenicity bioassays in mice in assessing potential health risks associated with exposure to methylene chloride

Robert G Liteplo

Health Canada, Environmental Health Centre, 0802B1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OL2

G W Long

Health Canada, Environmental Health Centre, 0802B1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OL2

M E Meek

Health Canada, Environmental Health Centre, 0802B1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A OL2

Considerable research has been conducted to identify possible mechanisms of the carcinogenicity of methylene chloride in rodents, and to ascertain whether the observed increased incidences of liver and lung tumours in mice exposed to this substance, are relevant in assessing the potential hazards and risks to human health. On the basis of a study that purported to show qualitative differences between murine and human tissues, in the subcellular localization of the Theta-class glutathione S-transferase enzyme responsible for converting methylene chloride to a putative highly unstable, but reactive genotoxic metabolite, it was suggested that the mouse is an inappropriate model for human health risk assessment. However, other studies conducted in vitro with intact cells do not support the hypothesis that a putatively reactive metabolite of methylene chloride must be generated only within the nucleus in order to be able to interact with genomic DNA. Moreover, investigations employing semi-quantitative methods of mRNA hybridization are not convincing in identifying the subcellular localization of active Theta class glutathione S-transferase, and do not support the hypothesis of the differential subcellular localization of this enzyme within the nucleus of mouse, but not human cells. There is therefore, insufficient evidence to support the view that qualitative differences between humans and mice in the subcellular distribution of Theta-class glutathione S-transferase, renders carcinogenicity studies conducted with mice irrelevant in human hazard identi-fication and risk assessment.

Key Words: methylene chloride • dichloromethane • mouse carcinogenicity • human health • risk assessment

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 84-87 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719801700202


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
Annual Review of Cosmetic Ingredient Safety Assessments: 2005/2006
International Journal of Toxicology, January 1, 2008; 27(1_suppl): 77 - 142.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement