SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lindsay, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hambrook, J. L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lindsay, C. D
Right arrow Articles by Hambrook, J. L
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Diisopropylglutathione ester protects A549 cells from the cytotoxic effects of sulphur mustard

Christopher D Lindsay

DERA, CBD Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 0JQ, UK

Joy L Hambrook

DERA, CBD Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire, SP4 0JQ, UK

The A549 cell line was used to assess the ability of diisopropylglutathione (DIPE) to protect against a 100 mM challenge dose of sulphur mustard (HD) using gentian violet (GV), thiazolyl blue (MTT) and neutral red (NR) assays as indicators of cell culture viability.

As part of a continuing study of the efficacy of protective nucleophiles as candidate treatments for HD poisoning, several different combinations of protectant and HD were used to determine the optimal means of protecting A549 cells from the effects of HD. It was found that DIPE (4 mM) could protect cells against the effects of HD though for optimal effect, DIPE had to be present at the time of HD challenge. Cultures protected with DIPE were up to 2.9- fold more viable than HD exposed cells 48 h after HD challenge when using the GV, MTT and NR assays to assess viability. Observations by phase contrast microscopy of GV stained cultures confirmed these findings.

Pretreating A549 cultures with DIPE for 1 h followed by its removal prior to HD challenge did maintain cell viability, though at a relatively low level (only up to 1.4- fold more viable than HD only exposed cells). DIPE was also able to protect HD exposed A549 cultures when added to cell cultures at intervals of up to 12 to 15 min after the initial HD exposure, though viability tended to decrease over this period, so that at 1 h, addition of DIPE did not maintain the viability of the cultures.

This is the first such report of the anti-HD protectant properties of DIPE in A549 cells. It is concluded that the protection observed against HD is probably largely due to extracellular inactivation of HD by DIPE.

Key Words: sulphur mustard • A549 cell line • diisopropylglutathione ester

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 17, No. 11, 606-612 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719801701104


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
C. Guignabert, L. Taysse, J.-H. Calvet, E. Planus, S. Delamanche, S. Galiacy, and M.-P. d'Ortho
Effect of doxycycline on sulfur mustard-induced respiratory lesions in guinea pigs
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, July 1, 2005; 289(1): L67 - L74.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement