SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mückter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fichtl, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mückter, H.
Right arrow Articles by Fichtl, B.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Medline Plus Health Information
*Arsenic
*Poisoning
Hazardous Substances DB
*ARSENIC COMPOUNDS
*DIMERCAPROL
*SUCCIMER
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Are we ready to replace dimercaprol (BAL) as an arsenic antidote?

Harald Mückter

Walther-Straub-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Nuβbaumstrasse 26, D-80336 München, Germany

Bernhard Lieb

Walther-Straub-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Nuβbaumstrasse 26, D-80336 München, Germany

Franz-Xaver Reich

Walther-Straub-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Nuβbaumstrasse 26, D-80336 München, Germany

Göran Hunder

Walther-Straub-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Nuβbaumstrasse 26, D-80336 München, Germany

Udo Walther

Walther-Straub-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Nuβbaumstrasse 26, D-80336 München, Germany

Burckhard Fichtl

Walther-Straub-Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, Nuβbaumstrasse 26, D-80336 München, Germany

1 Dimercaprol (BAL), 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulpho nate sodium (DMPS) and meso-2,3-dimercaptosucci nic acid (DMSA) are effective arsenic antidotes, but the question which one is preferable for optimal therapy of arsenic poisoning is still open to discussion. Major drawbacks of BAL include (a) its low therapeutic index, (b) its tendency to redistribute arsenic to brain and testes, for example, (c) the need for (painful) intramuscular injection and (d) its unpleasant odour.

2 The newer antidotes DMPS and DMSA feature low toxicity and high therapeutic index. They can be given orally or intravenously due to their high water solubility. While these advantages make it likely that DMPS and DMSA will replace BAL for the treatment of chronic arsenic poisoning, acute intoxication - espe cially with lipophilic organoarsenicals - may pose a problem for the hydrophilic antidotes, because their ionic nature can adversely affect intracellular avail ability.

3 This article focuses on aspects dealing with the power of BAL, DMPS, and DMSA to mobilize tissue-bound arsenic in various experimental models, such as monolayers of MDCK (=Madin-Darby canine kidney) cells from dog kidney, isolated perfused liver from guinea-pigs, and perfused jejunal segments from rat small intestine.

4 The results show that hydrophilic DMPS and DMSA may fail to rapidly and completely remove arsenic that has escaped from the extracellular space across tight epithelial barriers. However, owing to their low toxicity, which allows larger doses to be applied, and the potential modification of their pharmacokinetics by means of inert oral anion-exchange resins, DMPS and DMSA may advantageously replace BAL when ever intervention time is not critical. With severe intoxication by organic arsenicals, when the point-of- no-return is a limiting factor, BAL may still have a place as an arsenic antidote.

Key Words: arsenicals • antidotes • in vitro models • cell culture • perfused organs • therapy

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 16, No. 8, 460-465 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719701600807


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
Y. Xu, Y. Wang, Q. Zheng, B. Li, X. Li, Y. Jin, X. Lv, G. Qu, and G. Sun
Clinical Manifestations and Arsenic Methylation after a Rare Subacute Arsenic Poisoning Accident
Toxicol. Sci., June 1, 2008; 103(2): 278 - 284.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement