This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Thompson, J. Articles by Vale, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Thompson, J. Articles by Vale, J. Pubmed/NCBI databases Medline Plus Health Information Occupational Health Pesticides Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Pesticide incidents reported to the Health and Safety Executive 1989/90- 1991/92

Pesticide Monitoring Unit, National Poisons Information Service (Birmingham Centre), West Midlands Poisons Unit, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK

PB Casey

Pesticide Monitoring Unit, National Poisons Information Service (Birmingham Centre), West Midlands Poisons Unit, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK

JA Vale

Pesticide Monitoring Unit, National Poisons Information Service (Birmingham Centre), West Midlands Poisons Unit, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham B18 7QH, UK

1 Data concerning pesticide incidents investigated by the Field Operations Division (FOD) of the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) in Great Britain have been collated for the three year period April 1989 to March 1992. Over this period the HSE investigated 613 incidents concerning pes ticides : 338 related to general or environmental com plaints not involving human poisoning and 275 were sus pected poisoning incidents.

2 The two hundred and seventy-five suspected poisoning incidents were assessed by the Pesticide Incidents Appraisal Panel (PIAP) as 'confirmed', 'likely', 'unlikely', 'not confirmed', or that there were 'insufficient data' to make an assessment. Assessed data are unavailable for eight incidents reported in 1989.

3 Four hundred and eighteen members of the public were involved in 202 assessed incidents and 79 workers were exposed in 65 assessed incidents. Overall, 129 (48%) inci dents were assessed as 'confirmed' or 'likely', 121 (45%) as 'unlikely' or 'not confirmed' and in 17 (6%) there were 'insufficient data' to form a judgement. Incidents occur ring in an occupational setting were assessed as 'con firmed' or 'likely' more frequently (62%) than those involving members of the public (44%).

5 Thirty-six per cent of those involved in a 'confirmed' poisoning incident were working with a pesticide or were in close proximity to the operator; 41% were on private property adjacent to a field being sprayed and a further 23% involved those walking, cycling or jogging past a sprayed field.

6 These data underestimate the number of occupational pesticide poisoning incidents in Great Britain as incidents involving sheep dips are not considered by PIAP but are dealt with by a parallel scheme run by the Veterinary Medicines Directorate. In addition, few of the non-occupa tional incidents, for example those referred to one of the UK National Poisons Information Service Centres, are included in these data.

7 Sixty deaths from pesticide poisoning were recorded in England and Wales between 1989-1991, though the major ity of cases followed the deliberate ingestion of a pesticide rather than occupational exposure. Only one of these was reported to the HSE and that concerned the deliberate ingestion of mevinphos. A second death reported to the HSE involved a farmer who died some 11 months after he became unwell following fumigation of his glasshouse soil with methyl bromide by a contractor. It is unlikely that this death was related to exposure to methyl bromide.

8 Over the 3 year period of the study there was an increase in the number of prosecutions laid before the courts (Under the Control of Pesticides Regulations 1986 made under the Food and Environment Protection Act 1985), though the number of Enforcement Notices served decreased. In addition, the average total fine decreased for the incidents prosecuted successfully.

Key Words: pesticide poisoning • Health and Safety Executive • occupational poisoning • pesticide spraying

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 14, No. 8, 630-633 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719501400802


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Ozdemir, H. Kar, Y. Bilge, G. Batuk, and H. I. Batuk Homicidal poisoning by injection of methidathion: The first ever report Human and Experimental Toxicology, August 1, 2009; 28(8): 521 - 524. [Abstract] [PDF]