SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leeuwangh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kersting, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leeuwangh, P.
Right arrow Articles by Kersting, K.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Compound via MeSH
*Substance via MeSH
Hazardous Substances DB
*CHLORPYRIFOS
Medline Plus Health Information
*Pesticides
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Evaluation of Four Types of Freshwater Model Ecosystem for Assessing the Hazard of Pesticides

Peter Leeuwangh

DLO Winand Staring Centre for Integrated Land, Soil and Water Research (SC-DLO), PO Box 125, 6700 AC Wageningen

Theo C.M. Brock

Agricultural University Wageningen, Department of Water Quality Management and Aquatic Ecology, PO Box 8080, 6700 DD Wageningen

Kees Kersting

DLO Institute for Forestry and Nature Research, PO Box 23, 6700 AA, Wageningen, The Netherlands

Experimental results are reported on four types of freshwater model ecosystem after administration of a single dose of chlorpyrifos. The fate, and primary and secondary effects of chlorpyrifos were compared between the model ecosystems, and were evaluated in the light of the predictive value of the current ecotoxicological hazard assessment procedure for pesticides. 'Slootbox', a fate model used in the ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticides in the Netherlands, overestimated chlorpyrifos concentrations. The primary effects of chlorpyrifos can be predicted accurately on the basis of single species laboratory toxicity data. The population effects observed in the microecosystems, microcosms, and mesocosms were consistent between all experiments and with the single species tests. Community metabolism, as a functional endpoint, was less sensitive than the structural parameters measured. Secondary effects, both for structural and functional endpoints, varied between the micro- and mesocosm experiments. At the present 'state of the art' in ecotoxicology, no a priori prediction of secondary effects in natural ecosystems will generally be possible. 0.1 times the lowest acute L(E)C50 for chlorpyrifos, as measured in the current ecotoxicological hazard assessment procedure, matched the NOEC mesocosm for a single dose of chlorpyrifos. Recovery of populations affected by insecticide stress was found to depend on factors such as life cycle characteristics and ecological infrastructure, in addition to the toxicant concentration. The onset of (potential) recovery is likely to start at an approximate concentration of the EC10(48 h).

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 13, No. 12, 888-899 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719401301212


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement