SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.B.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nielsen, J.B.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, O.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Effect of Four Thiol-Containing Chelators on Disposition of Orally Administered Mercuric Chloride

J.B. Nielsen

Department of Environmental Medicine, Odense University, J.B. Winsløwsvej 17, 5000 Odense C, Denmark

O. Andersen

Department of Environmental Medicine, Odense University, J.B. Winsløwsvej 17, 5000 Odense C, Denmark

Acute toxicity and the disposition of inorganic mercury depends on the route of exposure. Most previous studies on effect of chelators on inorganic mercury toxicity and toxicokinetics employed parenteral administration of both metal and chelator. However, the most prominent routes for human inorganic mercury exposure are the oral or pulmonary. BAL was previously considered the drug of choice in human intoxications with most heavy metals. This recommandation has been questioned during recent years due to the advent of the less toxic hydrophilic BAL analogues DMSA and DMPS. The present study, using oral administration of HgCl2 labelled with 203Hg, demonstrates that DMPS is superior to the other chelators in preventing mortality. Moreover, both DMSA and DMPS are superior to BAL and NAPA in alleviating acute toxicity and in preventing the undesirable distribution of orally administered mercury, especially to the brain. Further, oral administration of these chelators were more efficient than parenteral administration in reducing whole-body retention and organ deposition of orally administered mercuric chloride, most likely due to the prevention of intestinal uptake of mercury.

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 423-430 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719101000610


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




Advertisement