SAGE Journals Online
Advertisement
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Advertisement

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Human & Experimental Toxicology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minton, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Henry, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minton, N. A.
Right arrow Articles by Henry, J. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Pharmacodynamic Interactions Between Infused Adenosine and Oral Theophylline

Neil A. Minton

National Poisons Unit, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK

John A. Henry

National Poisons Unit, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK

1 Five healthy human subjects were given, in single-blind fashion, either (a) 625 mg theophylline orally, followed 4 h later, by a 40 min infusion of adenosine (40 µg kg -1 min-1 for 5 min, 60 µg kg-1 min -1 for 5 min and 80 µg kg-1 min-1 for 30 min), or (b) 625 mg theophylline orally followed by 0.9% sodium chloride infusion, or (c) placebo theophylline tablets followed by adenosine infusion.

2 All five subjects experienced adverse effects during adenosine infusion, mainly at the higher infusion rates; two subjects also experienced chest pain but not during combined treatment with theophylline and adenosine.

3 Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) rose by 16.5 mmHg (P < 0.001) following treatment with theophylline only, fell by 24.5 mmHg (P < 0.001) during the adenosine infusion after placebo theophylline and remained unchanged during the adenosine infusion following theophylline. Pulse rate rose by 12 min -1 (P < 0.01) during adenosine infusion following placebo, but not after theophylline alone or theophylline and adenosine combined.

4 The respiratory rate fell by 6 min-1 (P < 0.01) during treatment with adenosine only, being lower than for the two treatments containing theophylline (P < 0.05).

5 Plasma potassium and magnesium fell by 0.25 mmol I-1 (P < 0.001) and 0.037 mmol I-1 (P < 0.05), respectively, during treatment with theophylline only, but these effects were not altered by infusion of adenosine.

6 This study has demonstrated interactions between theophylline and adenosine on diastolic blood pressure and respiratory rate, but no interaction on metabolic parameters. Adenosine infusion is unlikely to be of value in the management of theophylline toxicity, but its effects on theophylline-induced cardiac arrhythmias remain unexplored.

Human & Experimental Toxicology, Vol. 10, No. 6, 411-418 (1991)
DOI: 10.1177/096032719101000608


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GutHome page
J M Remes-Troche, P Chahal, R Mudipalli, and S S C Rao
Adenosine modulates oesophageal sensorimotor function in humans
Gut, August 1, 2009; 58(8): 1049 - 1055.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Advertisement